the pauper James Croucher and his family were settled in that parish, MBT Shoes Clearance inasmuch as the only relief stated to have been given to them whilst residing out of the parish of Crondall, was the payment by the guardians and relieving officer of the Hartley Wintney Union, of the relief originally given by the relieving officers of the Hambledon Union, in which the paupers resided, and not by any officer of the parish of Crondall, and that, therefore, the respondents were not entitled to adduce evidence at the sessions of any such acknowledgment. The Court overruled the objection, and confirmed the order of removal, subject to the opinion of the Court of Queen's Bench whether the relief stated in the examinations to have been given by the guardians through the relieving officer of the Hartley Wintney Tory Burch Outlet Union, was sufficient to warrant the removing justices in considering it relief by the parish of Crondall. If the Court of Queen's Bench shall be of opinion that the relief stated in the examinations to have been given by the guardians through the relieving officer of Hartley Wintney Union, was not sufficient to ■warrant the removing justices in considering it relief by the parish of Crondall, then the order of sessions to be confirmed. The case was argued in Hilary Term*. Wallinger and J. Pitt Taylor, in support of the order of sessions.-The facts of this case are different from those in Reg. v. Little Marlow (11 Jur. 240) and Reg. v. Bradford, (10

Tory Burch Flats Jur. 753). In those cases nothing appeared on the examinations but the bare fact of relief having been given by the relieving officer of the union; in this case there is evidence to shew an order and acknowledgment of that relief by the board of guardians. By sect. 26 of the Poor-law Amendment Act (4 & 5 Will. 4, c. 76) parishes are united for the relief of the poor. By sect. 38, the laws for the relief of the poor are to be administered by a board of guardians, and each parish in the union is to send at least one guardian to be elected by the ratepayers of the parish from their own body. By sect. 54 all relief is to be ordered by the board of guardians, except in cases of urgent necessity, in which cases only the overseers have power to give relief. When, therefore, a parish is shewn to be in a union, and the board of guardians for that union are shewn to have ordered relief, there is evidence from which to infer that the relief was given on behalf of that parish. The guardians represent the ratepayers; and the acts of Tory Burch Shoes the guardians are liable to the same legal incidents as the acts of overseers before the stat. 4 & 5 Will. 4, c. 76. Settlement by acknowledgment was the legal inference from the act of relief given by the overseers to a pauper residing out of the parish.* Before Lord Denman, C. J., Patteson, Coleridge, and Wightman,