Search result
Cheap MBT Shoes personal estate, hereditaments, and property thereby bequeathed to his wife during her natural life, should be for her separate use and benefit, and that the annuities thereinbefore given should also be for the separate use of the respective annuitants, gave a power of leasing to the trustees, during the continuance of the life estates created by his will, over his property, and appointed the trustees executors of his will. The testator died in 1835, seised and possessed of considerable real and personal estate, including amongst other things a sum of 711. 10s. Long Annuities. The rent, interest, and dividends of this estate the tenant for life had been permitted to enjoy in specie, and it appeared also that two sums of 500/. and 50/., part of the testator's estate, had been invested by the executors in the Tory Burch Outlet purchase of two sums of 32/. 17*. Id. and 3/. 17*. 6<Z. Long Annuities, the dividends of which had also been enjoyed by the tenant for life in specie. The bill was filed upon the death of Martha Simpson against the trustees and executors, praying that it might be declared that the defendants ought to have sold the 71/. 10*. Long
Annuities, andinvested the proceeds, together with the said sans of 500/. and 50/., upon the trusts of the Christian Louboutin Sale will, and th: they were bound to make good to the plaintiff the ks which had been occasioned to the testator's estate lj their having neglected to do so.Romilly, Wood, Chaundless, Huilett, and Glasst, a»peared for the different parties. (Howe v. Lord iijrt. mouth, 7 Ves. 138; Pickering v. Pickering, 2 Bat. 31; S. C., on Appeal, 4 M. & C. 289; BethmtY.Eanedy, 1 Mon. & C. 114; Collins v. Collins, 2M.sK, 703; Goodenough v. Tremamondo, 2 Beav. 512; U\ It v. Mills, 7 Sim. 501; Pickup v. Atkinson, 4 Hare, 614; Sutherland v. Cooke, 1 Cole, 408).Sir J. Wioram, V. C, said, the fact that the leastholds were not to be converted, was undoubtedly acteumstance favourable to enjoyment in specie. (Howti. Lord Dartmouth, Bethune v. Kennedy). Another circumstance favourable to that construction was, thattfce testator who had not directed the general estate to be converted, had directed a certain fund to be invested ii the funds to answer the annuities, and that the fund at the expiration of the annuities should go to thos to whom the residue was given. There were alio other circumstances in Tory Burch Shoes this will, such as the occurrews ssi repetition




